scolopendra gigantea post-molt pics & analysis

szappan

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Mar 24, 2006
Messages
327
Good news! Last Friday (July 24th) I woke up to a freshly molted sc. gigantea. Premolt it was 25cm and while I didn't take any post molt measurements, it didn't really grow much, if at all. Still, I'm just happy for a successful molt.

There was some worry for the next few days though, as it took an exceedingly long time to harden up afterwards – almost a full week! I don't have air conditioning so during the day it gets up to about 30°C and at night it's in the low 20s. The terrarium it's in now has plenty of ventilation and the substrate is also not overtly moist. Really, I have no explanation for it. However, when I first received the specimen, I noticed that there was a "kink" on it's head plate, so it's very likely that it's taken a long time to harden before.



So anyways, here are the pics! (hides removed for photographing).


















The "Doom Sexing Method" didn't quite work out as well as with my alternans since the exoskeleton was a bit fragile and partially fell apart making things difficult. That said, while not 100% certain, I'm still thinking that it's a female because there's no apparent triangular shaped web spinner.








 

Galapoheros

ArachnoGod
Old Timer
Joined
Jul 4, 2005
Messages
8,982
Awe maaaan, only 25cm and your going to keep it:rolleyes: That's awesome! lol in the 5th pic, it looks like it's checking to see if it's done yet. I bet that thing at 25cm is amazing to see in person, it's hard to catch size like that with a pic. Congrats!
 

dougle

Arachnosquire
Old Timer
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
122
Giants

I want a collection of these giants , they are awsome.
 

Androctonus_bic

Arachnoprince
Old Timer
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
1,141
Ok; giving apart if this is a gigantea or not:)o ), can you explain how can I difference a female and a male using your method? Can I Believe in this metod for sex pedes?

Sorry like always I'm sceptic untill some body show me the opposite.:p

Cheers
Carles
 

Galapoheros

ArachnoGod
Old Timer
Joined
Jul 4, 2005
Messages
8,982
I think Szappan was using Latin to say, "another gigantic scolopendra...", not that he was using a sci name. So, robusta? gigantea, robusta, it all means big haha. Anyway, so what's the latest taxo on these things?
 

szappan

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Mar 24, 2006
Messages
327
Hello everyone and thanks for the compliments on the pictures / specimen. :)

Regarding the species:
The person that sold it to me originally told it to me as a sc. gigantea, but later wrote to say that it was now a sc. galapagoensis. It changes every few years I guess... YEARS ago I bought a "sc. viridicornis", but now it's a "gigantea dark-morph".

But for me, I usually go by what Rowland Shelley wrote in this thread, particularly key is post #6 where he mentions the spines on the prefemur, which is exactly what this species has. If this has now been revised, please let me know where to get that info because I'd love to read it.

Now, with that all said, I'm far from an expert and regardless if it's a gigantea or a galapagoensis, I'm still very happy! :)

Regarding the sexing method:

It's not anything I came up with, it's actually a sexing method that "Doom" came up with and first reported on here.

In this thread we compare the inflated exoskeletons of two sc. alternans.

The male's exoskeleton will show a web-spinning organ which appears as a denser pointed triangular shaped appendage on the exoskeleton. The female's genitalia will, in addition to the absence of this spinning organ, may possibly have four darker spots, but this part isn't conclusive.

Obviously the results still need to be double-checked with actual mating experiments, but I do believe that this is a step in the right direction and the method we need to move towards. I mean, what else could that triangular-shaped appendage be? :? And we've had too many casualties the "old fashioned" way.
 

peterbourbon

Arachnolord
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
622
Hi,

if this is the SouthWest-Peruvian centipede that was formerly sold as "S. gigantea robusta" then it's actually the formerly known "Scolopendra gigantea weyrauchi" which has been synonymized with S. galapagoensis by R. Shelley mainly due to its distribution and dorsoapical spines on prefemur and femur as far as I remember correctly. The paper:

Shelley R.M., Kiser S.B. (2000) "Neotype designation and a diagnostic account for the centipede, Scolopendra gigantea L.,1758, with an account of S. galapagoensis Bollman 1889 (Chilopoda Scolopendromorpha Scolopendridae)" Tropical Zoology 13

Maybe Shelley focused on the basic question in the thread if this centipede is S. angulata or not. That's way easier to exclude than the admittedly confusing thing with S.g. weyrauchi.

Regards
Turgut
 

Galapoheros

ArachnoGod
Old Timer
Joined
Jul 4, 2005
Messages
8,982
I forgot about that recent thread, I think there are a lot older ones too(?) Great pics of the pede. This taxo stuff never ends, really good up to date info, ...it will get changed to something else later haha:wall:
 

szappan

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Mar 24, 2006
Messages
327
Thanks for the help Turgut! :worship:
I found that paper you mentioned in your post, ironically enough in a FANTASTIC thread by Steven... which really should be a sticky.

It's sort of strange to think "I've got a sc. galapagoensis". It's just a shame I can't rename this thread to "scolopendra galapagoensis post-molt pics & analysis". ;)
 
Top