Methal
Arachnosquire
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2014
- Messages
- 61
http://s35.photobucket.com/user/cixelsydmi/media/Animals/pinktoe1.jpg.html
My pinktoe looks nothing like that.
My pinktoe looks nothing like that.
Probably because there are many, many different avic species and this one is simply a different species than yours.http://s35.photobucket.com/user/cixelsydmi/media/Animals/pinktoe1.jpg.html
My pinktoe looks nothing like that.
+1Probably because there are many, many different avic species and this one is simply a different species than yours.
I'm assuming they meant Avic. avic. when they said "Pink Toe" after reading their other post. So in that case, that Avic in the linked picture is not necessarily a different species. As you agree with.+1
'Pinktoe' tarantula refers to the genus 'Avicularia', there are tons of different 'pinktoe' species though. Look up A. versicolor for example, it is still called a 'pinktoe' too.
My A. avicularia large juvenile looks just like this.....under the right lights, without it, it looks blackish.
I bet it's not minatrix, but maybe we need more pics and send them to the FBI cyber forensics division to be sure hahaha- just messin!Pictures can be misleading, especially when it comes to Avics. You can Not use color as a basis for identification in a picture of a specimen in the Avic Avic complex. Considering lighting, camera settings, size of the specimen, and where the specimen is in it's molt cycle can all change the color of the specimen in a picture. That may just be a pure Avic. avic., or a hybrid, or a different species but we will never know until an educated Avic keeper compares it in person. Unfortunately, taxonomists won't touch Avics or at least until Fukushima's revision is complete. My point is, we can not jump to conclusions using only pictures(and only one, at that).