![]() |
|
|
#16 |
|
Arachnoking
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 2,922
|
I have not heard about the burm, were all the offspring female as is usually the case with parthenogenesis?
I read an article a couple of years ago about a timber rattler giving birth to a parthenogenic litter that included males as well as females, which is really, really bizzare. Normally with parthenogenic reproduction, the offspring are essencially clones of the mother. Wade |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Arachnolord
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 640
|
I don't think it took long for people to realize that if this was indeed parthogenesis, females would be the sum. I've gotten many emails regarding the babies. Yes, I will be offering them here, as I did last year.
Also, Hey Scott, can you please tell us how your doing with the babies from last years batch? I'd be interested in hearing how they're doing, how big they are etc. Here's an update. john
__________________
For some, it is the path...not the goal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Arachnoangel
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: FUNcie, Indiana
Posts: 995
|
maybe it was immaculate conception?
__________________
Anihilation of the Wicked |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Arachnolord
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 640
|
Update
The next step.
If I remember right this is where they become independant. If it's anything like last years babies, they won't leave momma until they've hardened up. Once they do, they have this magnificient blue coloration. Mom seems alittle worn out from this one, perhaps she's on her last leg. john
__________________
For some, it is the path...not the goal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Arachnolord
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 640
|
Well, I guess it's that time of year again for my girl. Here's a rundown of this gal's history with me:
I aquired her in March '02 I recall. June '02, she layed a clutch of eggs. The babies did fine and I still have two in my possession that are approx. 5" now. March '03, she molted. June 15, '03, she layed more eggs. They hatched in July 3rd, '03. Oct. 8, '03 she molted. Then, May 14, '04, I noticed that she made a bowl shaped depression in her substrate. I figured in order to make a nice spot for her to brood some more babies I'd have to provide a hide. I put it off for almost two weeks. Then I threw a towel over her entire enclosure, being the lazy f'er I am. Two days later...check the pic. This pic was taken today. Now, if these hatch, which I'm guessing they will, parthogenesis? or super sperm storage?--even after two years, and two molts. We'll see, and of course, look for pics if they hatch. john
__________________
For some, it is the path...not the goal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
pede-a-holic
|
great info !!!
she allready got quite a history awsome pede-mom!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Arachnoprince
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,674
|
Hi John,
thats great news. It seems that there is definitely a time of year for egg laying, there is a fair few people who have just had new clutches, all around the same time. In my opinion it is almost definitely parthenogenisis, there are too many people who have had eggs laid long after obtaining a pede and having it molt repeatedly. The real proof will be a centipede raised from a pling up to an adult that lays fertile eggs, as i doubt sperm would be transferred whilst they are tiny. Can you give me an idea of the setup you are using? What temperature is it being kept at, humidity etc? Do you think the egg laying it triggered by a change in temperature, or something like day length? Anyway, good luuck and i hope they are fertile. Cheers, Last edited by danread; 05-27-2004 at 09:20 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Arachnopeon
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 34
|
It seems to me there must be an academic or two, somewhere in the world, who would be interested in knowing this, and in doing a few simple tests, if material were available. 10 years or so ago, this would have been a tedious undertaking, but the appropriate molecular biological techniques to confirm parthenogenesis are pretty commonplace these days. DNA fingerprinting, for example, has gone from the mystical to the mundane. First, one would need some very basic genetic info about the species: chromosome number, structure, sex chromosomes, does meiotic recombination occur, a few genetic markers, etc.....and then all that would be required would be a fairly rudimentary lab setup. It doesn't take much to run a Southern blot.
OK, the more I think about this, the more I wonder if anyone dependent on grant money has ever had the luxury of caring. Still, I think it would not be ridiculous to freeze or otherwise preserve any dead specimens or eggs--I assume DNA could not be obtained in reasonable quantity from a molt? Has anyone taken the time to examine published scientific 'pede literature on this topic? A very quick search turned up some peer-reviewed papers on other genera, and I would be a bit surprised if there weren't similar pubs for Scolopendra. How many academic investigators read this board? Many of us are fond of pointing out that, considering the state of the field, hobbyists can make legitimate contributions to academic/scientific knowledge, right?
__________________
"The Son of God was dead as a doornail. So it goes." -----Kilgore Trout |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Arachnoprince
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,674
|
Hi Stemloop,
I'm currently doing a PhD in molecular entomology/ecology. I've got access to lots of journals at my university, and i've spent a lot of time searching for papers on scolopendra. Believe me, there really isn't very much at all. In fact, it really is suprising how little peer reviewed work there is on scolopendra. I've found a few papers on venom, but little to nothing on ecology and reproduction. As you said, it really is an area where hobbyists can contribute a lot! I think the main problem has been a lack of funding, scolopendra arent significant in terms of agriculture, economy, and because so little is know about the species, in conservation either. One of my colleagues has got a travel grant to go to Hawaii later this year to colect samples to study food web interactions on the island of Kauai. I've asked him to collect me enough samples of the native scolopendra so i can carry out gut analysis of what they are eating, using PCR (which is the field i'm working in). It's not a part of my PhD, but i might get a paper out of it hopefully. There is nothing i'd like more than to study scolopendra, you could do years of work just studying Scolopendra subspinipes at a molecular level, and making phylogenetic trees, but unfortunately the lack of funding is always going to be a problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Arachnoknight
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 258
My Mood:
|
Congrats John! You've done some great work here, and what a break thru! I'd think about an article on this, you definately have enough photos and info. It sure would be nice to see one in E&A's Invertebrates Magazine....hint hint....
__________________
http://swiftinverts.com/pix/kelly2.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Arachnodemon
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Troutdale, Oregon
Posts: 730
|
Great !!!
I have three S.Heros coming in Friday. I was going to start buying these, try and sex them and then mate....might be better to just keep them seporate and hope for females!! Bob |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |||
|
Arachnopeon
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Todd
__________________
"The Son of God was dead as a doornail. So it goes." -----Kilgore Trout |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Arachnoprince
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,674
|
Quote:
Symondson, W. O. C. (2002). "Molecular identification of prey in predator diets." Molecular Ecology 11(4): 627-641. Basically, we are using oligonucleotide primers designed to only amplify specific target species of invertebrate prey. For instance, a lot of the work is done on British agricultural systems (as that is where the funding is). Carabid beetles are used as a good generalist predator model, although work has also been done on spiders, parasitic nematodes (me), predatory flies, and now the hawaiian food web work. By designing primer pairs that will only amplify specific species of pest species, such as aphid, or slug, it is possible tell if that predator is eating the pest species in the field. This is done by dissecting out the gut (or in small organisms, using the whole body), extracting the DNA and running our species specific primers. A postive will be indicated by a band on an agarose gel. This is useful for building up a picture of food web interactions, and what species should be encouraged to improve biological control of agricultural pests. I'm really enjoying the work i do, i find predator prey interactions really interesting. I'm sure it's where some of my interest in Scolopendra comes from! It would be great to apply some of these techniques to Scolopendra, as nobody knows for sure what they are feeding on most of the time, and it is sure to change at different times of the year. Also, because of the fact that the species are so unstudied, it is quite possible that some are extremely rare or close to extinction, so it might be possible to get funding. I know i'll definitely look into it when i finish my PhD! Cheers, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Arachnolord
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 640
|
update on egg
Well, I guess we'll never know. She ate them only a couple of days later.
I suspect they were infertile. I guess I should look for a male. john
__________________
For some, it is the path...not the goal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Arachnoprince
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,674
|
I'm sorry to hear that John. Did the eggs look any different to previous batches that were fertile? I'm wondering if there is any way to tell early on if they are fertile or not?
Cheers, |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|